7/ The utterly innapropriate response of governments to an assumed virus- masks, social distancing, economic destruction was due to medical advisers and people like ‘Neil fergusen’ (from the Imperial college of London) models which wereredone with death numbers drastically reduced only one day after old models were completed)
- First off we will investigate Neil Ferguson’s historic blunders:So Neil Ferguson, the Imperial College epidemiologist was behind the disputed research that sparked the mass culling of eleven million sheep and cattle during the 2001 outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease.
He also predicted that up to 150,000 people could die. There were fewer than 200 deaths. . . .
In 2002, Ferguson predicted that up to 50,000 people would likely die from exposure to BSE (mad cow disease) in beef. In the U.K., there were only 177 deaths from BSE.
In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009.
In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K.
Last March, Ferguson admitted that his Imperial College model of the COVID-19 disease was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus.
Ferguson declined to release his original code so other scientists could check his results. He only released a heavily revised set of code last week, after a six-week delay.
And these people make a living predicting Armageddon, then present a “solution”.
PROBLEM – REACTION -SOLUTION
The MSM are too corrupt, inept or lacking in curiosity to do a modicum of due diligence, and the average man on the street is too used to taking orders & spoon fed “information” from “experts” & these experts are never checked.
The “real experts” that provide substantial evidence backed up with FACTS which differs from the narrative gets banned. Where is the logic.
I mean dear God, CNN is now running that professional scam artist Greta as a “coronavirus expert”.
- It’s suggested epicentres like Wuhan and Lombardo high death rates are from environmental factors with deaths being falsely attributed to ‘Covid-19’ with it’s questionable ‘PCR test’ or worse ie. ‘assumptions’ being made for cause of death.
- This link is to the FANTASTIC ANNOUNCEMENT that was IGNORED by mainstream media that Trump and the Surgeon General of the US have DUMPED the outrageously exaggerated computer ‘model’ for projection of infections in the US. Note major news outlets did NOT advertise this. WHY??https://www.europereloaded.com/trump-dumps-fear-based-gates-who-cdc-big-rx-dr-fauci-from-coronavirus-task-force/Dr Rashid Buttar coverage of the announcement: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNK9zesHQls&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR1NJEO0OuQkMI0FNfP-I_vbVeQ4Ery2EiezWrFYrt7dgtrc91UKG8gdENs